For years, the tech review community has been plagued by ambiguous agreements between brands and influencers, but it seems that Google has finally gone too far with the Pixel 9. Influencers that participated in the company’s invite-only Team Pixel program, which distributes Pixel products to influencers ahead of their general release, were prohibited from featuring Pixel products alongside rival models. In addition, influencers who expressed a preference for rival phones ran the risk of being removed from the program. The new terms meant that people who wanted to work in tech reviews would have to decide between maintaining honesty and maintaining access.
The Verge has independently verified screenshots of the new Pixel phone provision from this year’s Team Pixel agreement, which many influencers started sharing on X and Threads last night. Participants are “expected to feature the Google Pixel device in place of any competitor mobile devices,” according to the agreement. Additionally, it states that “they will need to cease the relationship between the brand and the creator if it appears other brands are being preferred over the Pixel.” It looks like the form’s link has been removed.
“#TeamPixel is a distinct program, separate from their press and creator reviews programs,” Google communications manager Kayla Geier said in response to a question from The Verge. Getting Pixel smartphones into the hands of content creators—rather than journalists and tech reviewers—is the aim of #TeamPixel. This new wording that was added to the #TeamPixel form yesterday was deleted because it was deemed inappropriate.
Online confusion was undoubtedly induced by those words, since some people believed they applied to all product reviewers. That isn’t the case, though. There are no such requirements for media like The Verge using Google’s official Pixel review program.
What precisely is Team Pixel, then? Officially, it’s a PR agency 1000heads initiative that distributes early units to superfans and influencers in an effort to spark interest in becoming brand ambassadors. Although Google and 1000heads are partners, the initiative is not managed by Google, and it differs greatly from the conventional reviews program. For instance, before or during an event, journalists and influencers involved in the official reviews program are frequently informed and sent items under embargo. Participants in Team Pixel receive the devices soon after launch, before of the general public, in exchange for some social media promotion. This can provide smaller creators with a significant access advantage.
Creator Adam Matlock, who reviews electronics for his TechOdyssey YouTube channel, says, “I joined the program over five years ago because it was a great way to get a phone and either relatively early or on time, which, in the review world, is big.” Prior to this, Matlock claims there was no necessity other than to adhere to FTC disclosure standards by using the hashtags #teampixel or #giftfromgoogle. While many found the new Team Pixel terms uncomfortable, Matlock and others saw them as a way to expand their channels or a stepping stone to a career as journalists and reviews. This is especially true given Google’s seemingly arbitrary definitions of terms like “press,” “tech reviewer,” and “content creator.”
Well-known tech YouTuber Marques Brownlee clarified on X that he was not bound by such rules and was not a part of the Team Pixel program. Meanwhile, additional independent reviewers and freelance tech journalists with whom The Verge talked claim that they were previously assigned to the Team Pixel review units program. The new requirement threatens the livelihood and integrity of those in the latter group. Matlock claims that because of the increased terms, he has subsequently left the Team Pixel program.
The Tech Ninja channel’s YouTuber Kevin Nether claims the provision caused him to leave the Team Pixel program. As a professional technology reviewer, I collaborate with several businesses. Being forced to use a single product is something I don’t want to do since it doesn’t work for me.
The word “influencer” is broad and includes a wide range of artists. While some influencers follow high ethical standards, many do not. The issue is that customers are not given clear parameters to follow and are only given limited notice about whether the content they read or watch was compensated for. Although the FTC is taking action to reduce the number of false and deceptive internet reviews, the general public still finds it challenging to distinguish between a real review and marketing. Although this disaster wasn’t caused by the Team Pixel initiative, it is a frightening illustration of the hazy condition of internet reviews.
Stay updated here at Tech Exposed, and if you want, Buy us a coffee!
